Kubernetes orchestration tools have been a top priority for our development team since their release in 2014. Kubernetes (K8s) is now the go-to tool for launching and managing containers in cloud environments. It is a stable, open source, multi-purpose platform that scales to support large clusters of large and diverse workloads. Major cloud platforms and enterprise OS environments also support Kubernetes.
Given the number of Kubernetes use cases and architectural designs, you might think that everyone would use this tool. However, finding the right project to leverage Kubernetes can be difficult, and some resources can be complex to implement and manage once you’re up and running.
If you’re interested in using Kubernetes without the complexity and increased resource usage, there is a light and easy container orchestration solution called K3s. Got it, K3?
Close-up
K3s is part of a new generation of lightweight container orchestration tools. A Rancher project developer describes K3s as “the perfect solution for a PhD situation.” Not feasible for K8s clusterology. Similar solutions include the Minikube, which is currently in development, and Canonical’s MicroK8s, which are easy to consume resources but not as easy to configure and use as other lightweight options.
K3 etc. are not perfect replacements for K8. However, they are minified Kubernetes distributions, with much the same code at the core, but using half the required memory than K8s. To achieve this small size, the developers have reduced the number of dependencies and removed some of the addons. His goal is to provide the core functionality of Kubernetes in a form that is less bloated and easier to configure and use.
Initially designed for edge computing and IoT settings, K3s works just as well in simple cloud computing deployments
K3 or K8?
Choosing K3 or K8 depends on your use case. In general, K8s is the best option if you anticipate high-volume scenarios with many applications across a large distribution of clusters. But if you’re looking for something that spins up quickly and supports smaller, lighter workloads without heavy data loads, K3 might be a better fit. Whether you’re looking to containerize or starting a small project, the team’s manpower and his individual experience with Kubernetes make his K3 a choice based on ease of use and setup time. There are cases.
It’s also important to note that K3s doesn’t include a distributed database, so it’s not suitable for distributed clusters that share data stores. Rancher maintains a distributed version of the SQLite database called Dqlite that can be used to add distributed database functionality to his K3s. Implementing this kind of solution can be a lengthy configuration and orchestration process.
Another important difference is that K3s run as a single binary, whereas K8s operate various components as separate processes. The K8s’ more sophisticated architecture improves stability and allows it to scale more efficiently to large capacities, making it much more complex.
In general, the advantages of K3s are also disadvantages when applied to classically unsuccessful projects on Kubernetes. For example, one of the advantages of K3s is their small footprint. This reduces the number of drivers and extensions. But if you need maximum flexibility and support a wide range of hardware and software components. These limitations come at a price in the form of customization and reconfiguration.
Ultimately, K3 or K8 are great options to help you containerize and orchestrate your workloads and manage your cluster. If you’re just starting out in a cloud environment and looking for an early proof of concept, or just want a simpler approach, check out K3s first.